The Fiat Standard — Lecture 10 (Fiat Fuels) • Study Notes

By /
The Fiat Standard — Lecture 10 (Fiat Fuels) • Study NotesDownload

The Fiat Standard — Lecture 10 (Fiat Fuels) • Study Notes

Overview

This lecture explores how the fiat monetary system has distorted global energy markets, particularly since the 1970s. Instead of addressing the root cause of rising energy prices — monetary inflation — governments manipulated energy markets, subsidized uneconomic alternatives, and created industries dependent on fiat subsidies. The result has been stagnation in energy progress, higher costs, unreliable power, and the reversal of industrial gains.

Part I: The 1970s Oil Crisis — Myth vs. Reality

  • Official Story: Prices rose due to the 1973 Arab-Israeli War and the Arab oil embargo.
  • Reality:
  • Shortages began in 1972, before the war or embargo.
  • U.S. oil imports did not decline; oil is highly liquid and fungible — buyers simply switched suppliers.
  • Prices rose from $2 → $30 per barrel in a decade primarily because of currency devaluation.
  • Parallel to Food Inflation:
  • Rising energy prices were blamed on external shocks.
  • Governments avoided tackling the true cause: inflationary credit expansion after the gold window closed.

Part II: America’s Sensitivity to Energy Prices

  • U.S. = most energy-intensive society:
  • Cars, suburbs, appliances, heating/cooling systems.
  • High consumption is a sign of prosperity, not guilt.
  • When energy prices rise:
  • Americans feel disproportionate pain.
  • Politicians scramble to offer cheaper substitutes instead of tackling inflation.

Part III: The Fiat Solution — Subsidized Alternatives

  • Post-1970s, the U.S. government prioritized “renewable energy” experiments:
  • Synfuels
  • Photovoltaics (solar)
  • Biofuels
  • Natural gas
  • Nuclear
  • Trillions of fiat dollars poured into subsidies, mandates, and loans.
  • Result: decades of promises, “3–5 years away” hype cycles, but no replacement of hydrocarbons.

Part IV: Why Hydrocarbons Are Irreplaceable

  • Nature’s batteries: High-density, portable, energy-rich fuels.
  • Advantages:
  • High power output.
  • High energy density per weight/area.
  • Easy global transport (standardized barrels, pipelines).
  • Without hydrocarbons:
  • Modern life (electronics, aviation, steel, construction, medicine, computing, Bitcoin mining) collapses.
  • Renewables’ flaws:
  • Low power density (require massive land use).
  • Intermittent (sun/wind availability, not on-demand).
  • Require batteries, which multiply costs 10–20x.
  • Cannot even be manufactured without hydrocarbons.
  • More accurate to call them “hydrocarbon laundering”: hydrocarbons build the panels/turbines, which then produce “green” energy.

Part V: The Drivers of Fiat Fuels

  1. Government: Reduce oil demand → suppress prices → political relief.
  2. Ideological Cults: Anti-human, anti-industrial beliefs (“humans are parasites on Earth”).
  3. Renewable Industry: Hucksters profiting from subsidies and regulations.

Part VI: Climate Hysteria as Justification

  • Changing narratives:
  • 1970s: “We are running out of oil!”
  • 1980s+: “We have too much oil; burning it will destroy Earth!”
  • Opposite reasoning, same conclusion: use less oil.
  • CO₂ crisis claims:
  • Hockey-stick charts, ocean acidification, sea level hysteria.
  • None supported by long-term data (sea levels, temperatures, tree-line history).
  • COVID lockdowns as natural experiment:
  • Global emissions plunged, yet CO₂ concentration trends remained unchanged.
  • Temperatures/climate showed no discernible impact.
  • Key Point: Burden of proof lies on those advocating policies that would kill billions by dismantling hydrocarbon infrastructure.

Part VII: Hydrocarbons Save Lives

  • CO₂ emissions correlate with declining deaths from climate-related causes:
  • Modern technology (housing, infrastructure, medicine) shields us from storms, floods, and extremes.
  • Climate-related deaths today are <10% of what they were a century ago.
  • Hydrocarbons are not destroying Earth’s climate; they are enabling humans to survive it better.

Part VIII: Energy Economics — The Market for Power

  • People don’t need abstract “energy.” They need power on demand:
  • Bursts of concentrated energy at specific times/places (e.g., starting a car engine).
  • Sunlight is infinite, but useless without costly technology to capture, store, and deliver it as high-power energy.
  • Renewables fail because:
  • They don’t match the marginal need for power.
  • Conversion + storage (batteries) make them uneconomical.

Part IX: The Consequences of Fiat Energy Policy

  • Rising energy costs:
  • Rich countries face blackouts and unreliable grids (Germany, UK, California).
  • Poor countries are denied industrialization due to “green aid” restrictions.
  • Stagnation in energy growth:
  • Pre-1970s: ~2% annual growth in per-capita energy consumption.
  • Post-1970s: Stalled — humanity consumes about the same as 50 years ago.
  • Signs of regression:
  • Aviation slower today than in 1960s–70s.
  • Supersonic flight abandoned.
  • Energy per capita plateaued.
  • Industrial revolution’s trajectory reversed.

Key Takeaways

  1. Rising energy prices in the 1970s were caused by inflation, not embargoes.
  2. Hydrocarbons = irreplaceable foundation of modern civilization.
  3. Renewables are subsidy-driven scams, not viable substitutes.
  4. Climate hysteria constantly shifts narratives but always pushes the same anti-energy agenda.
  5. Hydrocarbons save lives by enabling resilience against nature.
  6. Energy demand is about power at the margin, not abstract totals.
  7. Fiat policies have stalled energy progress, reversed industrial gains, and made energy more expensive.
  8. The only true “alternative” to hydrocarbons is poverty, cold, and darkness.
Scroll to Top