DANTE



On Sparta by Plutarch is a collection of writings that provide a detailed account of the Spartan society, its customs, laws, and legendary figures. Plutarch, a Greek biographer and moralist, presents a comprehensive picture of the unique aspects of Spartan life that set it apart from other Greek city-states.
Plutarch discusses the legendary lawgiver Lycurgus, who is credited with founding the Spartan social system and establishing its militaristic and austere lifestyle. Lycurgus’s reforms focused on creating a society centered around equality (among male citizens), military fitness, and austerity. His laws aimed to eliminate luxury, promote communal living, and prepare citizens for war.
The agoge was the rigorous education and training regimen mandated for all male Spartan citizens, emphasizing obedience, endurance, discipline, and combat skills. Plutarch describes how boys were taken from their families at a young age and subjected to harsh training designed to cultivate resilience and loyalty to the state.
The Spartan army was renowned for its discipline, organization, and fighting capabilities. Plutarch illustrates the importance of the military in Spartan society, where every male citizen was expected to serve as a soldier. The focus was on creating an elite warrior class dedicated to defending Sparta and its interests.
Unlike in other Greek city-states, Spartan women were afforded a relatively high status and had more freedom. They were encouraged to engage in physical training to ensure they would bear strong children and were involved in managing the household in their husbands’ absence. Plutarch highlights how Spartan women were integral to maintaining the ethos and continuity of the state.
Plutarch details various aspects of Spartan life, including the communal dining system (syssitia), the importance of simplicity and austerity, and the prohibition of precious metals and luxuries. Spartans were expected to live modestly and place the needs of the community above personal desires.
The book recounts the lives and deeds of famous Spartans, such as King Leonidas, who led the 300 Spartans at the Battle of Thermopylae, and King Agesilaus, whose leadership extended Sparta’s influence. These stories illustrate the virtues that Spartans admired, such as bravery, loyalty, and self-sacrifice.
On Sparta provides a vivid portrayal of a society that was distinctively focused on martial prowess, social discipline, and communal unity. Through Plutarch’s accounts, readers gain insight into the values and principles that shaped Spartan society and the individuals who defined its history. The text serves as both a historical record and a moral commentary on the Spartan way of life, highlighting the unique blend of austerity, valor, and communal commitment that characterized Sparta.
This collection is a valuable resource for understanding the complexities and contradictions of Spartan culture, from its famed military strength to the rigid social structures that governed daily life.
By studying Plutarch’s work, we can better appreciate the historical context of Sparta’s rise and fall and the enduring legacy of its ideals in Western thought.

Nietzsche explored the tension between truth and perspectivism, akin to the debate between empiricism and rationalism. He argued that the world is inherently complex and what we perceive is only a slice of reality. This raises questions about the nature of reality, the limitations of our perception, and the interpretive structures we impose to make sense of the world.
Nietzsche was interested in how these perspectives could be reconciled, especially considering that having a perspective inherently means imposing a structure on what might be considered “truth.”
Nietzsche critically examined the foundations of morality and religious thought, highlighting the problem of moral relativism:
Nietzsche’s critique of morality suggested that as societies encounter diverse moral systems, their own confidence in an absolute moral order may falter, leading to societal fragmentation and a potential descent into nihilism.
Nietzsche’s concept of the “will to power” is often misunderstood as a will to dominate. However, he envisioned it as a fundamental drive to assert one’s existence and express one’s capabilities:
Nietzsche believed that a life-affirming perspective was necessary to combat the nihilistic tendencies arising from the recognition of life’s inherent suffering and lack of objective truth.
Nietzsche contrasted two fundamental aspects of human nature:
Nietzsche saw Western culture as a dynamic interplay between these opposing forces. The balance of the Apollonian and Dionysian elements is crucial for a healthy, vibrant life, avoiding the extremes of dry rationality or unchecked hedonism.
Nietzsche challenged the Enlightenment’s emphasis on reason and scientific rationalism:
Nietzsche questioned the notion that reason alone could provide a foundation for understanding the world, arguing instead that human motivations are deeply rooted in biological impulses and drives.
Nietzsche believed in the necessity of faith—not in a religious sense, but as a guiding principle to navigate the uncertainties of life:
Nietzsche’s philosophy underscores the idea that creating and adhering to a personal narrative or “story of life” is essential for making sense of one’s existence and asserting one’s will in the world.
Nietzsche’s life was marked by intense intellectual exploration and personal suffering, which deeply informed his philosophical inquiries into the nature of existence, morality, and truth.
Nietzsche remains a complex and often controversial figure whose work continues to provoke thought and debate. His exploration of perspectivism, the critique of morality, the will to power, and the affirmation of life against nihilism provide a framework for understanding the complexities of human existence. His thoughts on the interplay between reason and instinct, the necessity of faith, and the construction of personal narratives remain relevant in contemporary philosophical discourse.
Your essay, “Gravity Bound,” explores the tension between the physical constraints of reality and the human desire for freedom and transcendence. You begin by discussing the inspiration behind Elon Musk’s ambition to explore space, while also grounding the reader in the importance of humility and connection to the earth. This leads into a reflection on personal and societal transformation, using the metaphor of a butterfly emerging from a cocoon to suggest that many people remain trapped in ideological and societal “bubbles.”
You then delve into the theme of modern domestication, comparing humans to domesticated animals confined in urban environments, leading to a loss of natural instincts and increased aggression. The essay shifts to encourage finding joy and strength from within rather than relying on external validation, advocating for a simpler, more physically active lifestyle.
Further, you discuss your personal experiences walking the perimeter of Philadelphia and observing society’s growing addiction to technology, likening it to a form of modern-day possession. The essay concludes with a call to continuous self-evolution and a return to a childlike state of openness, creativity, and playfulness, despite being bound by gravity. The overall message is to break free from societal constraints and live more authentically and freely.

While we may be bound to gravity, let’s try to go upwards. The insane audacity of Elon Musk, crafting rockets with his mission to explore Mars and the universe, is inspiring to me. However, we must remind ourselves that the laws of physics are real, and that simple things like gravity are what hold our feet to the ground and are what make us human, after all. I believe that gravity, and being low to the ground, actually is where you find yourself most close to God. When I was in the lowest elevated city in the world, Jericho, and put my face down onto the ground, submitting to God in a mosque, this was the first time I’d ever felt the presence of God. Perhaps to become closer to God, we must be low to the ground, like a child.
Once the caterpillar comes out of the cocoon and transforms into a butterfly, it cannot go back to that state, locked away in the cage. The butterfly is now free, with beautiful colors and patterns upon its wings, soaring freely into the sky. I think that a lot of people in this modern world live in a bubble, or inside of the cocoon. Just think of the way the individual in society subscribes to political ideology, whether left or right, Democrat or Republican, or even divides themselves based on their race, black or white, and even religion, Judaism, Christianity, or Islam. We like to put ourselves in boxes and subscribe to certain ideologies, ways of life, philosophies, and dogma, without even considering possibilities on the other side.
One thing I’m very grateful for is during my childhood, while I spent my youth in the suburbs surrounded by essentially 100% Caucasian children, in the summertime I would visit my grandmother‘s house in West Philadelphia, Overbrook, where I was the only Caucasian kid, surrounded by 100% African-Americans. I remember going to the poppy store, buying water ice, going to the block parties, playing video games, football in the grass, skateboarding, etc., without even considering the color of the skin of the children I was playing with. When you’re a kid, you’re not hardened by society, or the way in which we divide ourselves through such rudimentary means like color. When you’re a kid, you simply see another kid, and you ask if they want to play, and you just go and do the thing. Now, when you’re an adult and you go through these different bureaucratic systems, you have to check boxes and let people know, yes, I am Caucasian, no, I am not Hispanic, yes, I am African-American, etc.
One strange thing I’ve noticed about photographers these days is, they specifically seek out photographing particular groups of people, or particular “color” of people, as the core theme of their projects. This is very strange. We divide ourselves, box ourselves in, without even thinking about it because it has become so normalized. Ultimately, I think this is a problem and will only get worse over time if we continue down this path of division.
Again, just think of a child, and the lack of preconceptions they have about other children. We should be more like children, more open, and pure. We should be more like a butterfly, with a variety of colors, patterns, shapes, and forms, flying upwards, to a new height, towards freedom from societal norms.
Think of the way man is domesticated like a dog in this modern world, living in luxurious condos, boxed into an office with air conditioning, a cubicle, and seated in a big baby stroller, the automobile, every morning. Not only are we becoming pets, domesticated in these condos, but we’re also suppressing our natural biological urge to reproduce, and instead of producing children, simply buy pets, like dogs, and treat them like our children inside of these boxes. I believe this way of life will have some negative side effects on man’s evolution. A quick story from last year, while walking down Chestnut Street:
While I was practicing my street photography, chilling, strolling at a very leisurely pace, this extremely fast-moving man came up from behind me, brushed me on my shoulder, pushing me, telling me to
“Get the fuck out of my way!”
I remember calmly looking up and down at the man, asking him what his problem was, and as I looked at him, I noticed his weak and feeble frame, his very ugly facial hair, his white collar, and came to the conclusion that he most likely is some office worker who has no freedom or time. He started to press me some more, so I took my shirt off, flexing on him, and started responding extremely aggressively to him like an untamed dog or a wolf, and he ultimately wound up going his own way. What I found funny about this poor, poor man is that he is just a lost puppy, a domesticated dog, who probably has to take orders from a boss in an office, sitting down for the majority of the day, resulting in the weak physiological body upon his frame, that made it so easy for me to dominate him with my simple presence alone.
When man is domesticated, put into a cage, they will become like a bull, and act very aggressive on the streets, naturally. Because this man probably spends eight hours of his day in a very unnatural space, anger, uneasiness, and anxiety are the inevitable outcomes of this way of life. Men should not be put into a cage, or else they will become aggressive, like a bull, irritated, marching through the streets, pounding their way past people, without any care in the world. While I initially responded calmly, I don’t tolerate bullshit from anybody, especially somebody who’s going to punk me around both verbally and physically. I think we should just be more like the elephant, tall, intelligent, and strong, capable of taming the bull with our sheer presence alone.
Don’t depend on any external stimuli for happiness. You should never have to depend on another person, thing, or experience to feel cheerful. The simple pleasures, such as walking, sunlight, and clean water, are enough to keep me smiling throughout the day. I find that when you’re turning yourself into the strongest version of yourself, the best that you can possibly be, striving for excellence, it is inevitable that you will be cheerful. I find that cheerfulness is needed right now, and something that we should find from within. I think man is very simple, and just seeks peace and tranquility, despite the way that we thrive in chaos. Personally, all I really need is an open space, the sun on my face, and some meat in my fridge for the evening, to be happy. I think happiness, cheerfulness, derives from the will to power. Cheerfulness is a physiological effect of your muscles contracting, hormones releasing, and the feeling of conquering yourself. When you wake up in the morning, stand right up, and don’t sit or lay down until the end of the day, when it’s time to go to sleep. When you’ve drained all of your physiological power and energy from your body throughout the entirety of the day, you will feel unstoppable, you will be cheerful, and you will be happy. If you do not possess the physiological power to stand and walk all day, with the need to take breaks, sit down, etc., you will feel defeated. To be cheerful, simply continue marching onwards every day.
One of my favorite walks to do in the city of Philadelphia is to start from the Philadelphia Museum of Art, by the Schuylkill River Trail, walking the entirety of the city, from river to river, all the way to the Benjamin Franklin Bridge, the Delaware River, and everywhere in between. I walk along the perimeter of the city, the outskirts, where there is no real street activity, that you would typically experience in the center of town. This is my happy place, my route that brings me the most joy. I love walking along the outskirts of my city, alone, in solitude, and thriving in the spaces in between. As a photographer, can you thrive in solitude, on the perimeter, the outskirts, away from the hustle and bustle? Can you find something in silence, where there is seemingly nothing?
When I start my day off in nature, enjoying the sounds of the birds, and the insects humming, I watch the river flow along the Schuylkill. Similarly, on a busy street corner, as I walk along the curb, I listen to the chatter of strangers and watch human behavior. Something strange that I have observed is our enslavement to technology, and the number of people that just walk to and fro, with their heads completely down, staring at their phones, AirPods plugged in, sunglasses on, moving at such fast paces, like they have no time to just walk for the sake of walking. When you walk on the streets with your camera, slow down, and walk 75% slower than everybody else around you. I think this is a fun way to live outside of the matrix, where you feel like you are Neo, slowing time down, watching life move by you in a frenzy, while you are simply calm, observing, and listening. Is it just me, or are the people on the streets becoming like The Walking Dead, zombies? Even when I take the bus, and I observe the media patterns of other people, and the things that they consume, it’s extremely alarming. I’ll watch somebody go from viewing a TikTok, to then scrolling to a separate app, that resembles gambling, to tap, tap, tap, and watch a bunch of colors appear, or whatever occurs during these strange video games, and then go straight back to texting, then to YouTube, then to TikTok once again, and then finally, back to the gambling app. Our media patterns are alarming, and the way that we interact with technology in public spaces becomes a good indicator of where the human condition is heading in modern society.
Sometimes I look into the vehicles when I’m waiting for the bus, and see how people just can’t get off their phones, vaping, consuming, snacking, without their hands on the wheel or paying attention to the road. We have zero focus, and perhaps are running on high cortisol, stress, because of the lack of time, and enslavement to emails and constant communication.
One funny, and unorthodox, thought I had about these people that are hypnotized by their devices is that the Zambians in the village I lived in during my Peace Corps service would probably think that they are possessed by some sort of witchcraft. In the village, they believe in witchcraft, magical crocodiles, and that witches are even responsible for the deaths of children. Honestly, people do seem kind of possessed.
To change is happiness. However, change can be both positive and negative. We can either evolve or stay in the cocoon. Like a snake, we must shed our skin and create anew. We must break free from the cocoon and fly like a butterfly. If you consider evolution this way, would you rather stay in the cage of a zoo, or roam freely like a lion?
The ultimate way to continuously evolve each day is to just go back to being a child. Unburden yourself, unharden yourself from society, and this modern world. Return to the childlike state of being, playful, cheerful, and open to new experiences, thoughts, and philosophy. Never stop changing your mind, and always find something new, through the creation of new art, thoughts, or even interactions with other people. Don’t limit yourself, or bind yourself to one way of doing things. Don’t chain yourself to any belief or any ideology. Do you remember when you were a kid, and you would climb trees, jump off of things, pretending like you could fly, like a superhero?
We may be bound to gravity, but it’s time for us to fly like a big kid with a cape on.
Street photography is about the will to power. It’s about tapping into your vitality and using that energy to fuel your daily practice. The more you walk, the more you see. The more you see, the more you shoot. It’s simple: he who walks the most shall win.
To improve in street photography, you must increase your strength and discipline. Commit to photographing every day, regardless of the outcome. Let go of expectations and embrace the process. Each step forward is a chance to capture something new, a moment that would otherwise be missed.
Build your routine, strengthen your resolve, and make it a habit. Let the camera become an extension of your body. Move with purpose, and let the streets be your training ground. Stay curious, stay active, and keep walking. This is the path to mastery.

The sculpture titled “The Wrestlers,” located in the Horticulture Center of Philadelphia, captures a moment of intense physical engagement between two athletes. This piece, a cast made in 1885 from a first-century BC Roman marble copy, is based on a lost third-century BC Greek original. The sculpture depicts the ancient Greek sport of pankration, a brutal blend of wrestling and boxing that was celebrated for its demands on strength, skill, and endurance.
“The Wrestlers” is a dynamic representation of two men locked in a fierce struggle. The powerful forms of the athletes, their muscles taut and their expressions focused, convey the intensity of the competition. This sculpture was cast from a Roman marble copy that now resides in the Uffizi Gallery in Florence, Italy. The original Greek bronze, created in the third century BC, has been lost to history, but the Roman copy and subsequent castings preserve the legacy of this ancient art.
This cast, made in 1885, captures the essence of Greek sculpture, emphasizing naturalistic anatomy and the dramatic tension of the moment. The detail in the depiction of muscles and veins, along with the realistic portrayal of the athletes’ efforts, showcases the skill of ancient sculptors in conveying human emotion and physicality.
Pankration, which means “all-powerful” or “all-strength,” was an ancient Greek martial art that combined elements of both wrestling and boxing. Introduced into the Olympic Games in 648 BC, it quickly became one of the most popular and revered sports of the ancient world. Unlike modern martial arts, pankration had very few rules: only biting and gouging the eyes were prohibited. The sport allowed for a wide range of techniques, including striking, grappling, joint locks, and chokeholds, making it a comprehensive test of a warrior’s combat skills.
Pankration was not just a sport but also a combat technique used by Greek soldiers. The Spartans, in particular, were known for their prowess in pankration, which they considered an essential part of their military training. The sport was seen as a reflection of the Greek ideals of arete (excellence) and andreia (manliness or courage), blending physical strength with mental toughness and strategy.
The historical significance of “The Wrestlers” sculpture goes beyond its artistic value. It serves as a cultural artifact that provides insight into the physical culture of ancient Greece. The sport of pankration, as depicted in this sculpture, was more than just a contest of strength; it was a display of skill, strategy, and resilience. It was a reflection of the Greek ethos, celebrating both the beauty and brutality of the human form and spirit.
The Roman admiration for Greek art and culture led them to create marble copies of Greek bronzes, such as “The Wrestlers.” The Roman copy that this cast is based on was restored in 1853 and became a significant piece at the Uffizi Gallery, showcasing the enduring influence of Greek art on later cultures.
“The Wrestlers” in the Horticulture Center of Philadelphia is not merely a sculpture but a window into the past, capturing the essence of ancient Greek sport and the ideals of physical and mental excellence that defined it. This piece, through its dynamic portrayal of the ancient sport of pankration, continues to inspire viewers with its depiction of strength, skill, and the enduring human spirit.

In the Horticulture Center of Philadelphia, the sculpture titled “The Journeyer” by Lindsay Daen stands as a powerful tribute to the 200th anniversary of the founding of the United States of America. Dedicated during the nation’s bicentennial in 1976, “The Journeyer” symbolizes the United States at a pivotal moment in its history, reflecting both its struggles and its enduring strength.
Lindsay Daen, an accomplished sculptor known for his ability to capture the human spirit, created “The Journeyer” to commemorate the bicentennial of the United States. The sculpture portrays a figure embarking on a journey, representing the nation’s path toward a better future for all its people. According to Daen, “he is going on a journey, not of conquest, but rather towards a goal of something better for all its people… A man no longer young, and not as brashly confident as he once had been… Somewhat battered by Vietnam and Watergate and the turmoil of the 60s, but… Still immensely strong.”
This sculpture captures the essence of America during the 1970s—a nation grappling with its past and looking toward the future with cautious optimism. The figure, depicted with a determined yet contemplative expression, embodies the spirit of resilience and hope. The detailed rendering of the man’s features and posture reflects both strength and weariness, illustrating the complexities of a nation that had endured significant turmoil yet remained committed to its ideals.
“The Journeyer” is rich in symbolism, representing the United States at a crucial moment of self-reflection. The sculpture conveys the idea of a journey not focused on conquest or dominance but on the pursuit of a more just and equitable society. The figure’s weathered appearance symbolizes the challenges and setbacks faced by the nation, including the Vietnam War, the Watergate scandal, and the social upheavals of the 1960s.
Yet, despite these hardships, the figure remains strong and resolute, symbolizing the enduring strength and resilience of the American spirit. This portrayal serves as a reminder that the journey toward a better future is ongoing and that progress requires both perseverance and a willingness to confront the past.
The sculpture was dedicated in 1976, a year marked by celebrations of the United States’ 200th anniversary of independence. The bicentennial was a time of reflection for the nation—a moment to look back on its history, acknowledge its achievements and shortcomings, and consider its future direction. “The Journeyer” reflects this spirit of introspection and forward-looking vision, capturing the nation’s hopes for continued progress and unity.
Lindsay Daen’s “The Journeyer” is more than just a sculpture; it is a narrative of a nation’s ongoing quest for growth, justice, and equality. As viewers stand before this piece in the Horticulture Center of Philadelphia, they are reminded of the resilience and determination that have defined America’s journey. The sculpture serves as a powerful symbol of the country’s enduring spirit, encouraging us to reflect on our own journeys and the collective path toward a better future for all.

In the Horticulture Center of Philadelphia, a sculpture of Giuseppe Verdi, crafted by G.B. Bashanellifusi, stands as a tribute to one of the greatest composers in the history of opera. Verdi’s works have become synonymous with Italian opera, blending drama, melody, and emotion in ways that have captivated audiences for over a century.
G.B. Bashanellifusi, a skilled sculptor known for his detailed and expressive representations, has captured the likeness of Giuseppe Verdi in this compelling sculpture. The piece presents Verdi in a contemplative pose, reflecting his deep connection to the world of music and his status as a revered cultural icon. The meticulous detail in the sculpture—from Verdi’s characteristic beard and thoughtful expression to the folds of his clothing—captures the essence of a man whose life was dedicated to the art of opera.
Giuseppe Verdi (1813-1901) was an Italian composer whose operas have become cornerstones of the operatic repertoire. Born in the small village of Le Roncole in the Duchy of Parma, Verdi showed an early aptitude for music. He went on to study in Busseto and later in Milan, where he began to develop his unique compositional style.
Verdi’s career spanned more than six decades, during which he composed 28 operas, numerous choral works, and several orchestral pieces. His music is characterized by its powerful melodies, dramatic intensity, and profound emotional depth. Verdi’s ability to convey complex human emotions through music made him a central figure in the development of Italian opera and a leading figure in 19th-century music.
Verdi’s operas are celebrated for their memorable arias, compelling characters, and dramatic narratives. Among his most famous works are:
Verdi’s contribution to opera is unparalleled. His ability to blend music with dramatic narrative created a new form of opera that emphasized character development and emotional depth. He was a master of orchestration and vocal writing, able to create powerful moments of drama and tenderness within his works.
Verdi was also a patriotic figure, deeply involved in the Italian Risorgimento, the movement for Italian unification. His music, particularly “Va, pensiero” from the opera “Nabucco,” became a symbol of national pride and unity.
Verdi’s thoughts on music and life reflect his deep understanding and passion for his art:
These quotes encapsulate Verdi’s love for his country and his innovative spirit in composing music that transcended the boundaries of his time.
The sculpture of Giuseppe Verdi by G.B. Bashanellifusi at the Horticulture Center of Philadelphia is a fitting tribute to a composer whose operas continue to captivate and move audiences worldwide. Verdi’s legacy as a master of melody and drama lives on through his music, which remains a testament to his genius and his profound impact on the world of opera. As one stands before this sculpture, one is reminded of the enduring power of music to evoke emotion, tell stories, and reflect the human condition.

The sculpture of Franz Schubert at the Horticulture Center of Philadelphia stands as a tribute to one of the most cherished composers of the Romantic era. Known for his lyrical melodies and innovative compositions, Schubert’s work has left an indelible mark on the world of classical music. This sculpture, crafted by Henry Baerer, captures the spirit of a composer whose music continues to resonate with audiences worldwide.
Henry Baerer, a notable sculptor of the 19th century, was renowned for his ability to capture the essence of his subjects. In his sculpture of Franz Schubert, Baerer depicts the composer in a moment of quiet contemplation, as if lost in thought over a musical phrase or melody. The sculpture’s intricate details, from the texture of Schubert’s hair to the folds of his clothing, reflect Baerer’s skill and sensitivity in portraying the inner life of his subjects. This work is not merely a visual representation but an artistic homage to Schubert’s profound impact on music.
Franz Schubert (1797-1828) was an Austrian composer who bridged the Classical and Romantic eras. Born in Vienna, Schubert displayed remarkable musical talent from a young age, quickly becoming a master of melody and harmony. Despite his short life—he died at the age of 31—Schubert was extraordinarily prolific, composing over 600 songs, nine symphonies, chamber music, operas, and sacred music. His ability to blend beautiful melodies with complex harmonies and rich emotional depth set him apart from his contemporaries.
Schubert is perhaps best known for his “Ave Maria,” a song that has become synonymous with beauty and spiritual reverence. Originally composed as part of his setting of Sir Walter Scott’s poem “The Lady of the Lake,” “Ave Maria” has been adapted and performed in countless settings, from religious ceremonies to concert halls, and remains one of his most beloved works.
Another masterpiece of Schubert’s is his oratorio “The Creation,” which showcases his gift for composition on a grand scale. This work is celebrated for its lyrical beauty and its ability to convey the majesty of the biblical story of creation through music. “The Creation” exemplifies Schubert’s skill in writing for both vocalists and orchestra, blending them seamlessly to create a work of profound depth and emotion.
In addition to his famous compositions, Schubert is often celebrated as the master of the art song, or “Lied,” a genre that combines voice and piano to create a deeply expressive musical experience. His songs, such as “Erlkönig” and “Die Forelle,” are known for their beautiful melodies, emotional intensity, and innovative accompaniment, which often adds another layer of meaning to the text.
Beyond his contributions to vocal music, Schubert’s instrumental works have also gained recognition. His “Symphony No. 8 in B Minor,” known as the “Unfinished Symphony,” remains one of his most famous works, celebrated for its haunting melodies and innovative use of orchestration. His chamber music, particularly his string quartets and piano quintets like the “Trout Quintet,” showcases his ability to write intricate, yet accessible, music.
Though not as widely quoted as some of his contemporaries, Schubert’s words reflect his humility and dedication to his craft:
These quotes reveal Schubert’s deep emotional sensitivity and his singular focus on composition as his life’s purpose.
The sculpture of Franz Schubert by Henry Baerer at the Horticulture Center of Philadelphia is more than just a representation of the man; it is a tribute to his enduring legacy as a composer who could convey the deepest of human emotions through music. Schubert’s works, from the spiritual “Ave Maria” to the majestic oratorio “The Creation,” continue to inspire and move audiences, transcending time and place. Standing before this sculpture, one is reminded of the power of music to capture the complexities of the human spirit, much like Schubert did in his all-too-brief but prolific life.

In the Horticulture Center of Philadelphia, a sculpture of Joseph Haydn stands as a tribute to one of the most influential composers in the history of Western music. This sculpture captures the likeness of a man whose work laid the foundations for much of what we now consider classical music.
The sculpture of Joseph Haydn in the Horticulture Center is a testament to his enduring legacy in music. The artist has carefully rendered Haydn’s thoughtful expression, capturing the essence of a composer deeply immersed in the creation of his art. The sculpture’s details, from the folds of his clothing to the contemplative pose, suggest a man both of his time and timeless in his contributions to culture and the arts.
Franz Joseph Haydn (1732-1809) was an Austrian composer, often referred to as the “Father of the Symphony” and “Father of the String Quartet” due to his significant contributions to these genres. Born in the village of Rohrau, Austria, Haydn began his musical journey as a choirboy in Vienna, where he received his early training. His prodigious talent soon became evident, leading him to work for several noble patrons throughout his career.
Haydn spent much of his life employed by the wealthy Esterházy family, which allowed him a stable environment to compose prolifically. During this period, he composed numerous symphonies, string quartets, operas, and other works that established his reputation across Europe. His music is characterized by its clarity of form, inventive use of harmony and melody, and a playful, often humorous character.
Haydn’s influence on classical music is profound. He was a key figure in the development of the Classical style during the 18th century. His work helped to establish the structure and form of the symphony and the string quartet, formats that would dominate orchestral and chamber music in the centuries that followed.
Some of his most notable works include the “London Symphonies,” a set of 12 symphonies composed during his visits to England, and the “Esterházy Quartets,” which pushed the boundaries of the string quartet format. His oratorios, such as “The Creation” and “The Seasons,” are also celebrated for their grandeur and innovative use of choral and orchestral forces.
Haydn was also a mentor to many younger composers, including Ludwig van Beethoven, who studied with him in Vienna. His influence can be seen in the works of Beethoven and other composers who followed, including Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart, who admired Haydn and with whom he had a close friendship.
Haydn’s wit and wisdom were as notable as his musical compositions. Some of his famous quotes reflect his approach to life and music:
These quotes encapsulate Haydn’s self-taught mastery and his belief in the universal language of music.
The sculpture of Joseph Haydn in the Horticulture Center of Philadelphia serves as a reminder of the composer’s monumental impact on the world of music. Haydn’s works continue to be celebrated for their creativity, complexity, and emotional depth. As we look upon this sculpture, we are reminded of a time when music was not just a form of entertainment but a crucial element of cultural and intellectual life. Haydn’s legacy lives on through his compositions, which remain a staple of concert repertoires around the world.

“Rebecca at the Well,” a sculpture by John J. Boyle, is a captivating piece located in the Horticulture Center of Philadelphia. This work of art draws inspiration from a famous biblical story, bringing to life a moment filled with meaning and emotion.
John J. Boyle (1851-1917) was an American sculptor renowned for his ability to capture human expression and emotion in bronze and marble. His sculpture “Rebecca at the Well” depicts the biblical figure Rebecca in a moment of stillness, her hands gently holding a water jug beside a well. Boyle’s attention to detail and his ability to convey emotion through posture and facial expression are evident in this piece, inviting viewers to ponder the narrative it represents.
Boyle’s choice of subject reflects the timeless appeal of biblical stories in art. “Rebecca at the Well” is not just a visual representation but a narrative sculpted in stone, capturing the virtues of kindness, humility, and divine purpose. The careful craftsmanship of the piece highlights Boyle’s skill in portraying not just physical likeness but also the inner qualities of his subjects.
The story of Rebecca at the well is found in the Book of Genesis, Chapter 24, in the Hebrew Bible. It tells of how Rebecca became the wife of Isaac, the son of Abraham, through a divinely guided encounter.
Abraham, seeking a wife for his son Isaac, sent his servant Eliezer to his homeland to find a suitable bride. Upon reaching the city of Nahor, Eliezer prayed for a sign to identify the right woman: the one who would offer water to him and his camels at the well. As he finished praying, Rebecca, the daughter of Bethuel, came to the well to draw water. She graciously offered water to Eliezer and his camels, fulfilling the sign that Eliezer had sought from God.
Impressed by her kindness and hospitality, Eliezer presented Rebecca with gifts of gold and jewelry, learning that she was from Abraham’s own kin. He then sought her family’s permission for her to return with him to marry Isaac. Rebecca’s family agreed, and she herself willingly chose to go, demonstrating faith and courage.
Rebecca’s actions at the well were seen as a divine sign, showing her as a woman of virtue, chosen by God to be a matriarch in the lineage of Israel. Her story symbolizes faith, divine guidance, and the unfolding of God’s plan.
The sculpture “Rebecca at the Well” by John J. Boyle beautifully captures this pivotal moment, blending artistry with a deep narrative significance. As viewers stand before this sculpture, they are not just seeing a representation of a biblical figure; they are invited to reflect on themes of faith, divine providence, and the role of women in biblical history. Boyle’s work continues to inspire, reminding us of the timeless stories that shape our cultural and spiritual heritage.

The sculpture of Reverend Dr. John Witherspoon by Joseph Alexis Bailly, located in the Horticulture Center of Philadelphia, captures the essence of a man whose influence spanned both religious and political spheres in early America. Witherspoon was not only a clergyman but also a vital figure in American education and politics, leaving a profound legacy through his writings and actions.
Born in 1723 in Gifford, Scotland, John Witherspoon was a dedicated theologian and Presbyterian minister long before he became an influential figure in America. He studied at the University of Edinburgh, where he earned a Master of Arts degree, and later, a Doctorate in Divinity from the University of St. Andrews. Witherspoon was a prominent preacher known for his eloquence and conviction, which helped solidify his reputation as a defender of orthodox Calvinism against the rising tide of Enlightenment thinking and secularism.
In his theological writings, Witherspoon often emphasized the importance of moral philosophy grounded in Christian doctrine. His sermons and pamphlets, such as “The Dominion of Providence Over the Passions of Men” (1776), argued that divine providence played a central role in human affairs, particularly in the struggle for American independence.
John Witherspoon authored several important works that articulated his religious and political philosophy. Among his notable publications are:
Witherspoon’s writings and speeches contain numerous memorable quotes that reflect his theological and political convictions:
These quotes illustrate Witherspoon’s belief in the interconnection between faith, morality, and governance.
John Witherspoon’s impact extended beyond the pulpit and the classroom. As the only clergyman to sign the Declaration of Independence, he was instrumental in shaping the ideological foundations of the new nation. His advocacy for independence was not merely political; it was deeply rooted in his religious convictions that divine providence favored the American cause.
Witherspoon’s tenure at the College of New Jersey significantly shaped the American educational landscape. He educated many future leaders, including James Madison, who would go on to become the fourth President of the United States. His influence on American political thought and his contributions to the development of a uniquely American form of Presbyterianism underscore his lasting legacy.
The sculpture by Joseph Alexis Bailly serves as a fitting tribute to a man whose life and work were deeply intertwined with the fabric of American history. As I observe the statue, I am reminded of Witherspoon’s unwavering commitment to faith, education, and the principles of liberty that continue to resonate today.

In this seminar, we explore Nietzsche’s Beyond Good and Evil and the concept of “philosophizing with a hammer,” a phrase coined by Nietzsche himself. This idea refers to both the technical and psychological impact Nietzsche’s philosophy has had on modern thought.
Nietzsche’s influence over the past 140 years has been profound, affecting both individual thought and broader cultural paradigms.
Nietzsche famously declared that “God is dead,” a statement that is often misunderstood.
Nietzsche was critical of the Judeo-Christian ethic, particularly what he saw as its underlying “slave morality.”
Nietzsche’s writing style was unconventional, blending aphorism, narrative, and poetic tools.
Understanding Nietzsche requires unpacking his dense and layered writings.
Nietzsche, like Dostoevsky and Jung, was able to perceive the deep undercurrents of societal change and articulate them prophetically.
Understanding the historical context in which Nietzsche lived helps in comprehending the dynamism of his ideas.
Nietzsche’s work, particularly Beyond Good and Evil, challenges readers to reconsider foundational beliefs and values. His philosophy invites us to explore the depths of thought, confront the consequences of the death of traditional morality, and consider the potential for creating new values in a post-religious world.
By engaging with Nietzsche’s thought, we can better understand the complexities of modern existence and the philosophical challenges we face in an increasingly secular world.

If you knew with 100% certainty that you are currently living in a science fiction dystopian world, how would you live your everyday life?
Nothing is really happening in the city. All innovation is done digitally. There’s no real innovation occurring in real life. The problem with this is, as we are all distracted by the gimmicks and novelty on our digital devices, we neglect the modern world around us and the advancements that occur within the physical realm. Think of the movie Ready Player One, where the main characters live in poverty, in tin shacks stacked on top of each other, but have virtual reality and live within that second world.
As it currently stands, we are enslaved to technology, and I believe we will only truly be free once we make robot slaves. ChatGPT can already and will complete every task done within 75% of modern workplaces within the next ten years. I’m pretty sure that Elon Musk already gave Neuralink to a few people who can operate technology from their brains. Didn’t he do this with a monkey, and now a monkey can play on the computer? I feel like if we can train monkeys to use computers, maybe humans shouldn’t use them?
So, if this were the case, how should we design our lives now, preparing for the future, in a new world of abundance?
Every week, there is a street preacher who stands on Market Street and constantly judges everybody, telling people that they’re going to go to hell if they don’t repent and accept Jesus as their Lord and Savior. What baffles me about this approach to preaching is how unwelcoming it is, almost equivalent to the fear-mongering from the news, just pure doom and gloom. Honestly, this preacher just creates hell for himself on earth by constantly speaking hell into existence. The more he speaks about this fiery pit where people will burn for all eternity, he is quite literally living there, right here, on earth, in his mind. He can’t shake the notion of hell out of his mind and has the nerve to constantly preach about it, as it has consumed him and his soul.
“And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother’s eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye?” – Matthew 7
What this preacher is doing is exactly what Jesus warned us against. Before judging other people, we must point out our own flaws. The preacher has not recognized the “beam” of fear that clouds his eye. With his obsession with hell, he creates a hellish existence for himself on earth, filled with anxiety over the fate of other people, disconnected from the core idea of Christianity, being love and forgiveness.
Have you ever woken up before the sun rises, listened to the sounds of the birds singing and insects humming, standing on top of a cliff, looking out towards a flowing river, a tree canopy, with beautiful, twinkling stars in the sky?
In the beginning, God created heaven and earth. On earth, there was darkness, but then there was light.
Fiat lux – let there be light
Ultimately, I believe we are all light, divine beings, created by God in his image. We all have an inner light, a spark of that divine quality within each and every one of us.
Sometimes when I walk around in nature, alone, and gaze up at the sun, it feels like there’s this gigantic spotlight shining down on me, reminding me that I am both a player and conductor of the cosmic drama that takes place on this stage that we call earth. There’s this warm feeling, quite literally a physiological feeling, of the sun kissing my skin, that flows love inside me. This reminds me of the light that exists within all people and that we all have a divine connection to one another, nature, and the universe at large. While darkness may cloud and consume the lives of many people, I believe if we align with nature, we can find our inner light. If all of humanity aligns with light, or simply steps outside, embraces the silence, recognizing our connection to nature itself, we can create heaven on earth. I’m already in heaven because I’ve aligned with nature, with the source, with the essence of what makes us who we are: light.
When I think about COVID-19, at the beginning, when I first went to a grocery store, a lady was screaming at me to “step back, 6 feet!” Everybody was in a frenzy, filled with anxiety, at scale, affecting the masses. During this time, many people were being canceled through digital media if they would not receive a vaccine or even use their freedom of speech. During this time, we saw more suppression than ever before when it comes to our speech. There were even newscasters calling out people who were unvaccinated for their decision, and that they should be banished from society. The amount of fear, guilt, and shame that was promoted during this time felt like the work of the devil or something sinister and very evil. If people cannot come together, despite having opposing views on science, health, religion, politics, or philosophy, then how will we ever advance as a society?
Going forward, let’s assume that all Internet users that have the time to leave comments, send messages, etc., are merely bot accounts. Think of platforms like Reddit and the arguments that occur in the comment sections. All Reddit users are bots. Think of the news on television, and how every channel feeds the same information over and over again. It does not matter where your source is coming from; it is all the same and best to just avoid it. I find it hard to trust other people who receive information through the TV, and especially people who use platforms like Reddit, Instagram, etc.
What I find interesting about producing media, instead of consuming media, is that it allows you the opportunity to augment your mind. When I use my GoPro and film my authentic thoughts while walking out in public, I never filter myself. I simply speak my mind and let my stream of consciousness flow out in words. I think this is something that is lacking within modern media, as everything has a script, and people put on a mask and become an actor. However, using a GoPro with the super view quite literally puts somebody, a viewer, in my shoes. With that perspective or POV, you not only feel like you’re there with me but also hear me clearly, through audio, and authenticity. Honestly, producing your own thoughts or media becomes extremely empowering. I think the problem with most people who seek to start a YouTube channel is they do it for an audience, pleasing others, seeking approval, or even some sort of fame or money. However, if you were making media simply to feed your own curiosities or potentially impact the life of one other person? If this was the goal, how would you approach making media differently? For me, creating media allows me to augment my mind, my thoughts, me, and allows me to think more deeply about how I view the world at large.
While I absolutely love living in the city, and believe it to be the supreme place for society to flourish, together, I can’t help but recognize how unnatural it is. The good thing about Philadelphia is the number of green spaces that we have, with the largest parklands within any city in the country, and also the Wissahickon forest, which is right in our backyard. Philadelphia has so many spaces to get away from the hustle and bustle, from the Schuylkill River Trail to the Delaware River and all of the parks in between. Aligning with these spaces provides the citizens of the city a way to appreciate the beauty that exists in nature. I always make an effort to walk through the parks when I practice my street photography because they simply uplift me. When I see birds fluttering by or hear the sounds of the wind blowing between the trees and the leaves, I think these very natural places are missing in society and cities as we sequester ourselves indoors, away from the natural beauty that exists in the world around us.
Maybe our grip strength is the ultimate sign of strength itself. Have you ever tried to climb a tree, gripping the branches and pulling your body weight up? When I was a young boy, I remember climbing trees that were so tall and enjoying myself swinging down hills on vines in the forest in my backyard. Our strength arises from the grip in our hands, our feet, and our legs. I think we should focus on grip strength more, through using two dumbbells and practicing the farmer’s walk. I also enjoy stretching my wrists every morning during my yoga routine, and I find this to be extremely helpful. When I wear barefoot shoes, I’m strengthening my feet, my calves, and my legs, with the lack of ankle support and the bare minimum sole that is 3 mm thick under the base of my foot. I’ll never forget when I was a Peace Corps volunteer in Zambia, Africa, and the boys played soccer without shoes on. I remember trying to participate in a similar fashion, removing my shoes, and ended up having to soak them for a week straight afterward, as I had blistered feet. However, the boys in the village all had such strong hands and feet because when they work and build homes or bricks, they do not use gloves, and when they play, they do not wear shoes. This creates a formidable body, a strong grip, through the hands and feet.
So ultimately, I’ve come to the conclusion that the best way to live life is that of a child. A child voluntarily plays. Think of when you went to the schoolyard and asked others if they wanted to play tag. Everybody was eager and ready to go, smiling and cheerful within their souls. However, as you get older and become an adult, you have to involuntarily play the game and become a slave to all of the systems we put in place. When I go through my day, I find myself in uncontrollable laughter when random things occur, like branches falling from a tree or even watching the way bystanders on the street interact with technology. Everything becomes extremely amusing or funny, which fills me with this cheerful sensation, with the mind of a child. I think we should just not take things so seriously, be cheerful, more gay, jolly, and a little bit more lighthearted. In a world run on fear, let’s break free from these chains, and fly out of the cage.
Thomas Jefferson was a vocal critic of central banking and the idea of a national bank. His views on central banking were shaped by his broader philosophy of limited government and his distrust of concentrated financial power. Here are some key aspects of Jefferson’s perspective on central banking:
- Constitutionality: Jefferson believed that a national bank was unconstitutional. He argued that the Constitution did not explicitly grant the federal government the authority to create a central bank. Jefferson adhered to a strict interpretation of the Constitution, believing that any powers not explicitly granted to the federal government were reserved for the states or the people (as outlined in the Tenth Amendment).
- Distrust of Centralized Power: Jefferson was wary of centralizing economic power in a national bank, which he felt would favor a small elite group of financiers and merchants at the expense of the broader population, particularly farmers and small landowners. He believed that a national bank would lead to corruption and undue influence over government by wealthy interests, undermining the principles of democracy and republicanism.
- Economic Philosophy: Jefferson favored an agrarian vision for America, where the economy was based on small-scale farming and local commerce. He was suspicious of banking and financial speculation, which he saw as fostering inequality and destabilizing the economy. Jefferson believed that central banks promoted inflation and were inherently exploitative, benefiting the rich while harming the common people.
- Opposition to Debt: Jefferson was also opposed to the accumulation of national debt, which he associated with the financial practices of European monarchies that he viewed as corrupt and oppressive. He believed that a national bank would encourage excessive borrowing and debt, leading to a loss of fiscal discipline.
In summary, Thomas Jefferson viewed central banking with deep skepticism and opposition. He saw it as unconstitutional, a potential source of corruption, and a threat to both economic independence and democratic governance. His views were largely in opposition to those of Alexander Hamilton, who advocated for a strong central bank to support the new nation’s financial stability and economic growth.